Cases 121 - 130 of 302
Isaac Mitchell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 12-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of Corrections, LOUIS FOLINO, individually and in his official capacity as SCI-Greene Superintendent, RAMBLER, individually and in his official capacity and others
Malik Hood v. Louis Folino, et al
as 12-1816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK HOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Reginald Byrd v. Louis Folino, et al
as 12-1725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD BYRD, a/k/a COMMONWEALTH EX RE R BYRD
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS FOLINO and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GARCIA v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv01430
Petitioner:
MIGUEL GARCIA
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAIRSTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00313
Petitioner:
KENNETH HAIRSTON
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLES v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00238
Petitioner:
BERNARDO COLES
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOPEZ v. VIDONISH et al
as 2:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
PETER VIDONISH, CRAIG HAYWOOD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKEITHER v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCKEITHER
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, SUSAN COWAN and GABRIELLA A. CONGELIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Folino et al
as 1:2012cv00205
Petitioner:
Angelo Lenell Davis
Respondent:
Louis Folino and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BYRD v. FOLINO
as 2:2012cv00451
Petitioner:
REGINALD BYRD
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
