Cases 121 - 130 of 1,644
(HC) Mancillas Medina v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01735
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Mancillas Medina
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MEDINA v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv01929
Petitioner:
CURTIS MEDINA
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv05260
Petitioner:
Jacer Medina
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. DuBois et al
as 7:2022cv08051
Plaintiff:
Luis Medina
Defendant:
Sheriff Carl E. DuBois, Wellpath NY LLC, Doctor Salwa Khouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03185
Petitioner:
Angel Medina
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R. Murillo v. John Thich, et al
as 22-16374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. MONA MURILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THICH, Correctional Sgt., E. BEAM, Correctional Lt., VERONICA LOMELI, Captain and others
(PC) Seymour v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Aaron D. Seymour
Defendant:
Doe 1, Medina, Gallardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Scowden et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Scowden, C. Redford, K. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00777
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. Gonzalez-Russell et al
as 1:2022cv07384
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
Eileen Gonzalez-Russell, ELAINE VELEZ, Dr. Michelle Small and others
Interested Party:
New York State Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
