Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 151 - 160 of 22,855
Carroll v. United States Marshals et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Petitioner: Tracy Carroll
Respondent: United States Marshals and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff: Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant: Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Neely et al
as 7:2024cv00267
Petitioner: Candice Cherie Martin
Respondent: Kimberly Neely and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bush v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv08008
Petitioner: Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phillips v. Ivey
as 4:2024cv00395
Petitioner: Matthew Sherman Phillips
Respondent: Governor Katherine Ivey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Marshall et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Alan Eugene Miller
Defendant: Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. Crabtree et al
as 6:2024cv00396
Petitioner: Stephen D Brewer
Respondent: Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Llovera v. Parker
as 5:2024cv00397
Plaintiff: Rafael Llovera
Defendant: Stephen Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. F C I - Talladega We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff: Paul Nash, Jr
Defendant: Warden F C I - Talladega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Mitchell
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner: Roderick Lee Williams
Respondent: Phillip Mitchell

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?