Cases 11 - 20 of 370
Spiker, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
George H. Spiker, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoover v. Clarke
as 1:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Malik Raheem Hoover
Defendant:
H. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browne v. Cane
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Zachary Russo Browne
Defendant:
Dr. James H. Cane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmon v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00841
Petitioner:
John H. Redmon
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Hoback et al
as 7:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Javon Lamont Arrington
Defendant:
Nurse Hoback and Nurse H. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiker, Jr. v. Sussex I State Prison et al
as 3:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
George H. Spiker, Jr.
Defendant:
Sussex I State Prison, Riner, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rand v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
James H. Rand
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crumpton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
William D. Crumpton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Harold Clarke, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffore v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Petitioner:
Banita Brandise Saffore
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, United States Department Of Justice, M. Dzubak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Squire et al
as 7:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Keyanta Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Squire, Sgt. N. Bowman, R. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
