Cases 11 - 20 of 278
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Lavarius Rodriguez Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. City of Durham et al
as 5:2024ct03041
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
City of Durham, Durham County Police Department, Angela Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avent v. Wind et al
as 5:2024ct03037
Plaintiff:
Antonio Santwan Avent
Defendant:
John E. Wind, David Bradley, Samuel D. Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis v. Kerns-Correll et al
as 5:2024ct03033
Plaintiff:
Antwain Lamar Dennis
Defendant:
Joyce Y. Kerns-Correll, Warden Williams, Case Manager Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Eric Adisha Hall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Amy Jenkins, R. Honeycutt, Jeffrey P. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Truner et al
as 5:2023ct03338
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Sgt. Truner and DAC of Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
