Cases 11 - 20 of 164
Wells v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01551
Petitioner:
Perry J. Wells
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peters v. Prime Care Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Peters
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Inc., Shelby Bailey, LPN, Perry County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrick v. Perry County Prison et al
as 1:2022cv01432
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barrick
Defendant:
Perry County Prison, Karen Barclay, Sgt. Greg Kline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA-DIAZ v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
OBERLANDER, PERRY, FISCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNO v. OBERLANDER
as 1:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TIERNO
Defendant:
DEREK OBERLANDER, E. MANGELUZZO, M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KENNEDY v. PERRY et al
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KENNEDY
Defendant:
LT. PERRY, WARDEN MARK BISHOP and DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL SCANEDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
OKE v. PERRIN et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
AYODELE OKE
Defendant:
PERRIN, JOSEFIK, HARRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. MEIR
as 2:2022cv01699
Plaintiff:
AVERY MIGUEL PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
C.O. MEIR and CHESTER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLER v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
RONALD FULLER
Defendant:
D. OBERLANDER, D. PERRY, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COPELAND v. D. PERRY et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
DAVID COPELAND
Defendant:
D. PERRY and D. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
