Cases 11 - 20 of 109
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Willams et al
as 1:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
William Stevenson
Defendant:
Dean Willams, Dean (I) Williams, Kellie Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swisher v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Bryan Lacy Swisher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swisher v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv01161
Petitioner:
Bryan Lacy Swisher
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swisher v. Angle et al
as 3:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Swisher and Christopher Swisher
Defendant:
Angle, Murphy, Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00693
Defendant:
C/O Swisher, Lieutenant Miller, C/O Hagston and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Municipality of the Sixth Judicial Circuit et al
as 8:2021cv01217
Defendant:
Brian Pingor, Scott Rosenwasser, Municipality of the Sixth Judicial Circuit and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe #1-1, Unit Counselor McBride, T. Millard and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Michael Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
