Cases 11 - 20 of 4,152
Hampton v. Franklin, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Octavius Darrell Hampton
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00468
Defendant:
Captain, Sgt. Moore, Lt. Gartland and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Leroy Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley Conor v. State of Alabama, et al
as 24-12516
Petitioner:
WESLEY DEWAYNE CONOR
Respondent:
VENTRESS CF WARDEN, STATE OF ALABAMA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Doe v. The Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Petitioner:
Christopher Blake Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Scofield v. Warden, et al
as 24-12403
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY WAYNE SCOFIELD
Wooten v. Shaffer et al
as 4:2024cv00988
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of ALabama and Scotty Shaffer
Petitioner:
David P Wooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2024cv00987
Defendant:
Convicted Inmates, Staff Employees, State of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
