Cases 11 - 20 of 24
USA v. Andre Jacob
as 11-4459
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-2871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, THOMAS MCCONNELL, CAROL A. SCIRE and others
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-2832
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, ALLEN LYNCH, ROBERT BITTNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS MCCONNELL, CAROL A. SCIRE and GREGORY GIDDENS
Jacobs v. District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv02622
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office, Jeffery A. Beard, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Jacobs v. Neal Mechling
as 10-3792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAVINDRANTH KOLLI, M.D., Former LTSU Psychiatrist, PETE SAAVEDRA, Psychiatrist-Fayette and others
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-1439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, DAVID MCCOY, THOMAS MCCONNELL and others
Jacobs v. Beard, et al
as 09-1025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE CORRECTIONS DEFENDANTS, PETE SAAVEDRA, RAVINDRANTH KOLLI and others
Andre Jacobs v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-3317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY ABRAMS, Former Corrections Officer, Current Counselor, BEN E. ANSELL, Former Corrections Officer, Current Counselor, JEFFREY BEARD, Former Corrections Officer, Current Counselor and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOVO
JACOBS v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2008cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
