Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Mohamed v. Jones, et al
as 22-1453
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KHALFAN KHAMIS MOHAMED
Defendant / Appellant:
JONES, HUDDLESTON, OSAGIE and others
Salazar-Velasquez v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022cv03287
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Alfonso Salazar-Velasquez
Defendant:
D. Hudson, (fnu) Armijo, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crandall v. Armijo et al
as 4:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Christopher Crandall
Defendant:
Armijo, Hurst and Stacey Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon McDermott v. Anna Moreno, et al
as 22-15718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON ALLEN MCDERMOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNA MORENO, Property Officer - Lewis Complex, BRIAN EVANS, Co. Account Movement, HIRST, First name unknown; Sergeant - Lewis Complex and others
Owens v. Federal Correctional Complex et al
as 1:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Lesley T. Owens
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex, Lovett, Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armijo v. Colorado State Board of Parole
as 1:2021cv02872
Petitioner:
Tony D. Armijo
Respondent:
Colorado State Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Uribe v. Armijo et al
as 2:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Pablo Enrique Uribe
Defendant:
Martha Armijo, Michale Page, Southmayd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kowalczyk v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00950
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator of Florence FCC/USP, Health Services Dept. of BOP, US Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kowalczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Barnhart et al
as 1:2020cv02513
Defendant:
J. A. Barnhart, G. Romain, S. Eacker and others
Plaintiff:
Verdell Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armijo v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Armijo
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
