Cases 11 - 20 of 328
Frosch v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
George Edward Frosch
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tim L Duke
Defendant:
Brian Collier and Warden Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sossamon v. Collier
as 7:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Respondent:
Brian Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rehart v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Steven G Rehart
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Officer K Smith, FNU LNU #1 6:24-CV-011 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bridges v. Collier et al
as 9:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Scotty J. Bridges
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Regional Director, Unknown Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. Dist. CT. of Dallas Co et al
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Dist. CT. of Dallas Co, Brian Collier, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdo v. Abbott et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Birdo
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Hon Elizabeth Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hornsby v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Adam L. Hornsby
Defendant:
Brian Collier and Securus Mail Processing Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
