Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Calloway v. Dunn et al
as 5:2020cv00807
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Gwendolyn Givens, Sean Bright and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald J Calloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Estes et al
as 5:2019cv00451
Defendant:
Sean Bright, Warden Dewayne Estes and James Williams
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Cook Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Dunn et al
as 5:2017cv01802
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Patrick, Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Estes et al
as 5:2013cv02185
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Sean Bright and K Hollingsworth
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owuor v. The U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2009cv01166
Plaintiff:
Peter Makusi Otemba Owuor
Defendant:
The U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, Blake Diamond, David Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Baylor et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Thaddeus Henry
Defendant:
Arthur Baylor, Bobby Bright, Officer Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cooks v. City of Montgomery et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv01057
Plaintiff:
Edward Cooks
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Bobby Bright and Warden Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sankey v. Bright et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01029
Plaintiff:
Adrian Sankey
Defendant:
Bobby Bright, Warden Collins, Dr. Mendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Montgomery City Police Department et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00950
Plaintiff:
Louis E. Miles, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery City Police Department, Officer Dickey, Bobby Bright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
