Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Holt v. Smiley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
Clyde Holt
Defendant:
Captain Smiley, Officer Ruffin, Officer Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharpe v. Carter et al
as 5:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Joe Anthony Sharpe
Defendant:
Betina Carter and Clyde Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv02228
Petitioner:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Respondent:
United States, Eric H Holder, Jr, PROPST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley v. Carter et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Chester Clyde McKinley
Defendant:
Ruby Carter , Kenneth L. Jones and Leon White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Gadsden City PD et al
as 4:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Clyde Harris
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Gadsden City PD and Chumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Snell v. Daniels et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv01075
Plaintiff:
Ronald Clyde Snell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Charles McKee, Althea Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Crawford, et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
Edward Frazier
Defendant:
Thomas A. Crawford, Clyde Knowlton, Robert J. Sewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Mitchem et al
as 1:2012cv03726
Petitioner:
William Clyde Bradford
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Clyde E Jones, Brandon K Falls, Anne Marie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suggs v. Baldwin County Mental Health Center
as 1:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Calvin Earl Suggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Baldwin County Mental Health Center, Dr. Cummins and Clyde Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
