Cases 11 - 20 of 425
Colvin v. Wilson
as 5:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Lawaun Montez Colvin
Defendant:
K.S.P. Officer Jimmie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsley v. Colvin et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Chad Parsley
Defendant:
G. Scott Colvin, Major Matt Lemonds, Hector Joyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Colvin v. John Gilley
as 23-5745
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH LAYMOND COLVIN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN GILLEY, Warden
Kelsey v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Scott Michael Kelsey
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lisa Farmer, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Costick et al v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government et al
as 5:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jason Costick and Joey Bardelas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, Lisa Farmer, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Colvin v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Joseph Colvin
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Colvin, Jr. et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2023cv02767
Plaintiff:
Leonard Colvin, Jr. and Michael Peace, Jr.
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, Stephen Tilton, James Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREAMER v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
SEAN LEE CREAMER
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colvin v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
Joseph Colvin
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Witherspoon v. Colvin
as 23-570
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerome Witherspoon
Respondent / Appellee:
John Colvin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
