Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Crossman v. USA
as 2:2014cv14102
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
David Crossman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shabazz v. Pataki
as 10-1899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael A.Z. Shabazz, AKA Michael Hurley
Defendant - Appellee:
George Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Anthony J. Annuci, Deputy Commissioner and counsel and others
Riches v. The Sporting News et al
as 4:2010cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Sporting News, Whitney Shaw, Ray Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Davitt v. Tim Vidrine, et al
as 09-15963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. DAVITT
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM VIDRINE, DEBRA BROOKS, ROBERT HENDRIX and others
Powell v. Gibbons et al
as 3:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kitrich A. Powell
Defendant:
James Gibbons, Ross Miller, Catherine Cortez-Masto and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Excell v. Fischer et al
as 9:2008cv00945
Plaintiff:
Mortimer Excell
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Dale Artus, Robert Woods and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zarif Shabazz v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv05961
Plaintiff:
Michael Aziz Zarif Shabazz
Defendant:
George E. Pataki, Glenn S. Goord, Anthony J. Annuci and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davitt v. Viderine et al
as 3:2007cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael Davitt
Defendant:
Viderine, Brooks, Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orraca v. DeLuke et al
as 9:2007cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jose Orraca
Defendant:
Frank DeLuke, J. Crossman, R.J. Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crossman v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2007cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dennis Tod Crossman
Defendant:
State of Idaho, City of Twin Falls and Department of Health and Welfare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
