Cases 11 - 20 of 34
CRUMP v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CRUMP
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Judd, Robert Mitchell Judd, Dennis Gates Miller and others
Defendant:
Quentin Miller, Jack Van Duncan, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03289
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Herring, Mark Fleming, Maury Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Pasquotank Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2021ct03236
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Harris
Defendant:
Pasquotank Correctional Institution, Sgt. Morris, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitener v. The Rutherford County Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Chris Francis, Jane Doe 1, RCDC's Healthcare Provider and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dale Whitener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Doe #1 et al
as 5:2020ct03126
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Watson
Defendant:
John Doe #5, Eddie Thomas, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lassiter et al
as 1:2020cv00058
Defendant:
FNU Slater, FNU Ayscue, Norma Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Benson Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. United States of America,et al
as 5:2019ct03332
Defendant:
John Doe #5, Jennifer Adkins, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. DOE #1 et al
as 1:2019cv01043
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, JOHN DOE #4, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
