Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Davis v. USA
as 3:2022cv00175
Petitioner:
David Michael Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2022cv00094
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Landis
Respondent:
David Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGinnis v. North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Defendant:
North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Mr. David Krabbenhoft, Mr. Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Cass County, et al.
as 3:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Defendant:
Cass County, Ronnie Albert, Lt. Timothy Briggman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Cass County et al
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Defendant:
Cass County and Sanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. City of Fargo et al
as 3:2021cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Defendant:
City of Fargo and Cass County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. Fargo Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Petro Serv USA and Fargo Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
United States, Cass County Jail and Sanford Health
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loggins v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00109
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriffs Department, United States and Cass County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Loggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Bismarck Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Laron Young
Defendant:
Bismarck Police Department, Mandan Police Department, Morton County States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
