Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Davis v. Phillips et al
as 5:2023ct03208
Plaintiff:
Devon Ellis Davis
Defendant:
Officer Phillips and Director Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Warden of Central Prison et al
as 5:2022ct03425
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis
Defendant:
Warden of Central Prison, Ramel Freeman and Donnie R. Raynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. CHANDLER
as 1:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RODNEY CHANDLER, SGT ELLIS, LT. GUILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Central Prison
as 5:2022hc02131
Petitioner:
Andrew Ellis
Respondent:
Central Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLIS v. CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
SHAWN PATRICK ELLIS
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, KEVIN M. KLINGLESMITH, JOSHUA HELMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellis v. Merci et al
as 5:2022ct03006
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Ellis
Defendant:
Sergeant Merci, James Honeycutt, Cory Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2021cv00855
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MR. JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. S. BRADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Barber et al
as 5:2021ct03284
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Ellis
Defendant:
Christine Barber, Shanticia Hawkins and Shirley Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillian v. Parent et al
as 5:2021ct03280
Plaintiff:
Antonio Devonn McMillian
Defendant:
Sgt. Parent, Wake County Detention Center Officers and Maj. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021ct03228
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ellis
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, County of Wake, Paul C. Ridgeway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
