Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Dean v. Gregory et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Preston L Dean
Defendant:
Jackie Gregory, Ginger Fabrizio, FNU Lenoez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Baker et al
as 1:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Baker and FNU Sprouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Payton v. Holcomb
as 22-6869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENZO PAYTON
Defendant / Appellee:
S. HOLCOMB, Albemarle C.I. Correctional Sergeant II, FNU BAKER, Albemarle C.I. Correctional Officer and FNU LOWDER, Albemarle C.I. Correctional Officer
Scott v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Briana N Scott
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, FNU Roberts, FNU Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Church et al
as 5:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
William Bradley Moore
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Velasco and FNU Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cliett v. Goins et al
as 5:2021cv00014
Defendant:
FNU Moss, FNU Baker, FNU Goins and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Michael Cliett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cliett v. Goins et al
as 3:2021cv00050
Defendant:
FNU Moss, FNU Baker and FNU Goins
Plaintiff:
Joel Michael Cliett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazel v. Cramer et al
as 5:2020cv03286
Defendant:
(fnu) Trevor, (fnu) Eagle, (fnu) Misler and others
Plaintiff:
James Russell Hazel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moretto v. Inch et al
as 2:2020cv00895
Defendant:
FNU Wilson, Mark Inch, FNU Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Moretto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
