Cases 11 - 20 of 20
ALLEN v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE et al
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
BRUCE EDWARD ALLEN
Defendant:
CITY OF CONNERSVILLE, FAYETTE COUNTY OF INDIANA and FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00552
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and LEONARD BAKER
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPE v. FAYETTE CO. SHERIFF
as 1:2019cv04835
Defendant:
FAYETTE CO. SHERIFF
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH COPE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. CANTRELL et al
as 1:2019cv01196
Defendant:
ERIC CANTRELL, STEVE BILLS, FAYETTE COUNTY WORK RELEASE and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMMERMAN v. LAUGHLIN
as 1:2019cv00921
Plaintiff:
David L Ammerman and DAVID AMMERMAN
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff Joey Laughlin and JOEY LAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREECH v. FAYETTE COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv02419
Respondent:
FAYETTE COUNTY and STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
BRENT D. CREECH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOUSER v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01283
Defendant:
RONALD BAKER, SYLVIA BOLING, FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
EMMA L. HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WHITE v. MAGA et al
as 1:2014cv01914
Defendant:
FAYETTE CO. JAIL and Dr. DOMINIC J. MAGA
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEELEY v. FAYETTE CIRCUIT/SUPERIOR COURTS et al
as 1:2013cv00136
Defendant:
KENNETH FAN, FAYETTE CIRCUIT/SUPERIOR COURTS, PAUL FREED and others
Plaintiff:
C. WAYNE SEELEY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEELEY v. COUNTY OF FAYETTE, INDIANA
as 1:2008cv00630
Petitioner:
CLARENCE W. SEELEY
Respondent:
COUNTY OF FAYETTE, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
