Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Roman v. Lee et al
as 1:2017cv05995
Plaintiff: Salvador Roman
Defendant: Lee, Foo, John Doe Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Foos
as 3:2017cv03048
Plaintiff: McKinley Dudley, Jr
Defendant: Cynthia Foos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Foos v. Gladieux et al
as 1:2017cv00188
Plaintiff: Rachael Foos
Defendant: David Gladieux and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foos v. No Named Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00826
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Foos
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Warnet et al
as 3:2014cv03003
Plaintiff: McKinley Dudley, Jr
Defendant: Logan Warnet and Cynthia Foos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Warnet et al
as 3:2013cv03060
Plaintiff: McKinley Dudley, Jr
Defendant: Logan Warnet, Cynthia Foos, Susan Flanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Warnet et al
as 4:2013cv00471
Plaintiff: McKinley Dudley, Jr
Defendant: Logan Warnet, Cynthia Foos, Susan Flanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foos v. Nicklin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00403
Petitioner: Cynthia Lynn Foos
Respondent: Julie A Nicklin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. City of Springfield Police Dept. et al
as 6:2013cv03046
Plaintiff: Derick James Mack
Defendant: City of Springfield Police Dept., Mark Foos, Jason Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bill Ogan v. Washington State Department of, et al
as 11-35482
Plaintiff - Appellant: BILL M. OGAN
Defendant - Appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY, Superintendent, PEASE, IMU Manager and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?