Cases 11 - 20 of 220
Leveke v. Maricopa County Sheriff et al
as 3:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Cody Ray Leveke
Respondent:
Maricopa County Sheriff and Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McNulty v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 3:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Jayson McNulty
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Strickland v. Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Kevin Strickland
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, Mark Tolbert, Cathy Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Warden FCI Gilmer
as 3:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Melvin T. Bell
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dickerson v. Warden FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Larry Dickerson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv06032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Santiago v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Marcos F. Santiago
Defendant:
J. C. Streeval, Dye, Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lara Suarez v. Warden Wolfe FCI Gilmer
as 5:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Sergio Manuel Lara Suarez
Respondent:
Warden Wolfe FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gilmer v. Zahnd et al
as 1:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Webber Douglas Gilmer
Defendant:
Eric G. Zahnd, Guy Kirtley and Matthew Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
