Cases 11 - 20 of 32
James v. Craggy Correctional Center Mail Room et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James and Harry Sharod James-El
Defendant:
Craggy Correctional Center Mail Room, Eric A. Hooks and North Carolina Department of Public Safety-DAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. United States
as 5:2021ct03191
Defendant:
United States
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Defendant:
JOE L. WEBSTER, LORETTA C. BIGGS and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03173
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper and Josh Stein
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James-El v. Stien
as 3:2021cv00275
Petitioner:
Harry Sharod James-El and Harry Sharod James
Respondent:
Josh Stien, Josh Stein, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00159
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv01060
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES-EL v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv01064
Defendant:
ERIK A. HOOKS, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DAC and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2020cv00902
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DAC, ERIK A. HOOKS, PAULA JONES and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
