Cases 11 - 20 of 4,167
Walker v. Wexford Health Source et al
as 1:2024cv09702
Defendant:
Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00485
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Petitioner:
DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christian Berger v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-2780
Defendant:
MEGAN BATTLES, Healthcare Administrator, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., LATOYA HUGHES, IDOC Director and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BERGER
Jaber Wilson v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-2760
Defendant:
M. ROSE, C/O #13576 at Lawrence CC, LIEUTENANT LENEAR, C/O at Lawrence CC #11459, ANTHONY WILLS, CAO of Menard CC and others
Plaintiff:
JABER WILSON
Zampini v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv02273
Defendant:
Bob Blum, M Lively, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zampini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zampini v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv02274
Defendant:
Bob Blum, Latoya Hughes, John or Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Zampini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2024cv02265
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Grievance Officer Pierce, Kevin Reichert and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb-Bey v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01360
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Travis Baylor, Tiffanie Clark and others
Plaintiff:
John Lee Lipscomb-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rajkumar v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03274
Defendant:
Steven Campbell, Timothy Adesanya, Diana Langdon and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Rajkumar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Holmes et al
as 6:2024cv06131
Defendant:
Steven Grasz, Jane Kelly, Tess Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
