Cases 11 - 20 of 130
Sivak v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv06255
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennett and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06111
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06013
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06014
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pace v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Marvin Pace
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Donald G. Davis, William J. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillon v. Salario et al
as 3:2023cv01017
Plaintiff:
**SANCTIONED/BARRED* Curtis E Dillon
Defendant:
Anthony Salario, William J Bennett, Charles Riddle, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLEY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dilley, Michael J Bennett (deceased), DANIEL K. DILLEY and others
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Kristen Dauss, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv02816
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gully, Jr
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Gilreath, D Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
