Cases 11 - 20 of 101
ELLIS v. NYIEDYE et al
as 1:2022cv02481
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
NYIEDYE, KRUL, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marsee v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00995
Petitioner:
Jamie Marsee
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marsee v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00457
Petitioner:
Jamie Marsee
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAWYER v. NUTTER et al
as 4:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SCOTT SAWYER
Defendant:
OFFICER NUTTER, BROWN, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSBIN v. CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF
as 2:2022cv00493
Plaintiff:
JAMI MICHELLE BUSBIN
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weddle v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Jamie Weddle
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Joseph Schneider and Hanely
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS JR v. SOMMER et al
as 1:2022cv01959
Plaintiff:
BYRON HARRIS JR
Defendant:
MEGAN SOMMER, ALEXANDER KOENIG, I MANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lott et al
as 3:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
A Lott, Jamie Eguia, Carlos Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. LaPorte County Superior Court No 1 et al
as 3:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
LaPorte County Superior Court No 1, Jamie Oss, David K Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEACHER v. PIMENTELL et al
as 1:2022cv01183
Plaintiff:
R. PEACHER
Defendant:
B. PIMENTELL and JAMIE DOWNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
