Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Phillips v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2020cv05047
Defendant:
Brad Phillips, Phillip Kuhlman, Kathy Cavanagh and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gene Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longshore v. Mason County et al
as 3:2019cv05844
Defendant:
Albert Hernandez, Mason County Sheriffs Office, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Charles S Longshore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. Baltzell et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
Jeneva Cotton, Schneider, Brian Schuetter and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockwell v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00186
Defendant:
US Air Force, City of Airway Heights, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Stockwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livermore v. Tonhofer et al
as 4:2018cv05075
Plaintiff:
Glen A Livermore
Defendant:
Debra Tonhofer, John Smith, Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. King County et al
as 2:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
David Miles
Defendant:
King County, Daniel T Satterberg and John and Jane Does 1-15
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. Longview Police Department et al
as 3:2014cv05749
Plaintiff:
Brian Thompson
Defendant:
Longview Police Department , City of Longview, Washington , Cowlitz County, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv05557
Plaintiff:
Terrell Edward Jones
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Justin Riley, Jose Aguiar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury v. Roher et al
as 3:2012cv05772
Plaintiff:
Jerry M Jury
Defendant:
L Roher, Department of Corrections, Client May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05421
Plaintiff:
Jason Cox
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Dan Pacholke, Pat Glebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
