Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Luellen Jr v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
Larry Luellen Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., M. Henze, Aquinaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Romeo Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Warden David Gomez, Warden Kenneth Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv05421
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Vargas
Defendant:
David Gomez, Marcus Hardy, Quentin Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn v. Harry
as 3:2015cv02381
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Osborn
Defendant:
Laural Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv04301
Plaintiff:
Abdul Love
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marcus Hardy, Derrick Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hakim v. Osborne et al
as 3:2013cv50067
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Drew Hakim
Defendant:
Kenneth Osborne, J. Utley, S. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2012cv11790
Petitioner:
Kenneth Osborne
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Corrections and Superintendent Corsini, MTC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Osborne v. Guthrie et al
as 5:2012cv00290
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Osborne
Defendant:
Thomas Guthrie, Vickers, Brian Jones and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Randle et al
as 1:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Larry Rodgers
Defendant:
Michael P. Randle, Gladyses C. Taylor, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilder v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04109
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Addus Health Care, Mark S. Heaney and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Wilder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
