Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv04017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kludt et al v. MCF-Rush City et al
as 0:2017cv03842
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Kludt and DeSean Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
MCF-Rush City, Minnesota, Ofc. Kunze, MCF-Rush City Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Roy
as 0:2017cv02790
Petitioner:
DeSean Lamont Thomas
Respondent:
Tom Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv04051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Bishop et al
as 8:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, Krista Balk , Ali Yah Yah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Bzoskie et al
as 0:2016cv03805
Plaintiff:
DeSean Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
James Bzoskie , Verby , Heart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeAngelo Thomas v. Pliska, et al
as 16-3713
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DeAngelo Lamont Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
Pliska, Sergeant, Peterson, Lieutenant, Jenkins, Sergeant and others
Thomas v. Dakota County Law Enforcement Center et al
as 0:2015cv02197
Plaintiff:
Desean Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
Dakota County Law Enforcement Center, Minnesota Department of Corrections, James Bzoskie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2011cv00571
Plaintiff:
Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Michael Puisis, Michael Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
