Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 11 - 20 of 806
Lee v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff: Robert Lee
Defendant: Grady Perry, Amber Paden and CoreCivic/SCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keach v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff: Brandon Lee Keach
Defendant: Ashly Taylor Martin, Stephen Taylor and Mary Beth Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff: Wendolyn Lee
Defendant: Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff: Jacorey King
Defendant: Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rayfield v. Bradley County, Tennessee
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: Ryan Lee Rayfield
Defendant: Bradley County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Harrison et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Plaintiff: Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant: Steven Harrison, Taffy Ann Wilson and Samuel F Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Wardlow
as 1:2024cv01043
Petitioner: Kelly Lee Pitts
Respondent: Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff: Lee Malone
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Phillips et al
as 2:2023cv02793
Plaintiff: Lee Malone
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Leeds We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00051
Petitioner: Corey Lee Moore
Respondent: Warden Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?