Cases 11 - 20 of 27
GOLDEN v. CONNELL et al
as 7:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LADON GOLDEN
Defendant:
E CONNELL, TYLOR COPELAND, LEWIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. All staff of the Benton County Detention Center et al
as 5:2015cv05023
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lewis Thomas
Defendant:
All staff of the Benton County Detention Center, Morgan, Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Wilkins et al
as 5:2013cv05246
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lewis Thomas
Defendant:
Wilkins, Laura, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Espino
as 3:2012cv00445
Plaintiff:
George Lewis Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
G.A. Espino and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. Department of Children and Families/Hillsborough Kids Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
D.D. Walker and Ileana T. Walker
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families/Hillsborough Kids Inc., Cori Lindley-Tracey, Octavio Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv01225
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and David Theophilius Hamilton
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Allen Bargery, William Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. NWCC Site 1 and Site 2 et al
as 1:2011cv01188
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and Terry Eugene Atkins, Jr.
Defendant:
NWCC Site 1 and Site 2, Special Needs DeBerry and Tenn. Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Pate et al
as 1:2011cv01154
Plaintiff:
Thomas D.E. Hale
Defendant:
Lewis Thomas Pate and David T. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. NWCX
as 1:2011cv01083
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hale and Lewis Thomas Pate
Defendant:
NWCX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Tirey
as 1:2011cv01079
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hale, Lewis Thomas Pate and David Hamilton
Defendant:
Melvin Tirey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
