Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Simpson v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2014cv00064
Petitioner:
Michael Simpson
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carbajal, et al v. Keefer, et al
as 14-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA CARBAJAL, DEAN CARBAJAL and LUIS LEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL R. MORRISSEY, JEFFREY WATTS, ROBERT FULLER and others
Michael Simpson v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 13-3683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BRAGG et al v. MALKIN et al
as 3:2013cv04899
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG, MICHAEL SIMPSON, PAUL WILKINS and others
Defendant:
STANLEY MALKIN, TORRANCE PHILLIP, PATRICIA HUNDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Sylvester v. Burl Cain, et al
as 12-31271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SYLVESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, Head Warden, CHAD MENZINA, Assist Warden, CHAD OUBER, C/O Major and others
Carbajal et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2012cv03231
Plaintiff:
Victoria Carbajal, Dean Carbajal and Luis Leal
Defendant:
Mitchell R. Morrissey, Mitchell (I) R. Morrissey, Jeffrey Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Simpson v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 12-4440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Michael Simpson v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 12-2645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
David Sylvester v. Burl Cain, et al
as 12-30090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SYLVESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, Head Warden, CHAD OUBER, C/O Major, CHARLES WESTBROOKS, C/O Captain and others
Samuel Harper, et al v. Oldham County Jail, et al
as 11-5517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL JOSEPH HARPER
Plaintiff:
GUALBERTO TELLES
Defendant - Appellee:
OLDHAM COUNTY JAIL, MICHAEL SIMPSON, JESSICA CHILDRESS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
