Cases 11 - 20 of 574
Payne v. Employs at CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
Employs at CCDOC, Mims, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. June Smith, Nurse Harrigan, Nurse Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PUGH v. MIMS
as 4:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
OTIS WADE PUGH, SR
Respondent:
Warden CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BATTLE v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Respondent:
CHARLES M MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Roark v. Dyer et al
as 2:2023cv02479
Plaintiff:
Jared W. Roark
Defendant:
Jerry Dyer, Margaret Mims, Manny Sandavol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Roark v. Dyer et al
as 1:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
Jared W. Roark
Defendant:
Jerry Dyer, Margaret Mims, Manny Sandavol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 1:2023cv04845
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BENNING v. GEORGIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 5:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
RALPH HARRISON BENNING
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF GEORGIA, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLISON v. MIMS
as 5:2023cv00368
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A ELLISON
Respondent:
CHARLES MIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEY v. WHITTINGTON, et al.
as 5:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant:
LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMS, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
