Cases 11 - 20 of 28
ANDREWS v. LUBBEHUSEN et al
as 2:2020cv00340
Plaintiff:
NORRIS DESHON ANDREWS
Defendant:
B. LAMMER, T.J. WATSON, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collicott v. Noble County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Lucas Allen, Corporal Charlotte, Max C Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan D Collicott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. NORRIS
as 2:2019cv00514
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. BENSON
Defendant:
ARNOLD NORRIS and NORRIS ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENSON v. ARNOLD et al
as 2:2019cv00491
Defendant:
NORTON ARNOLD, ZACHARY ADAMS and NORRIS ARNOLD
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. BENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAZIER v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv03835
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, RICHARD BROWN and NORRIS ARNOLD
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. BRAZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS et al v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY SHAWN NORRIS, JOHN DOE 1 and DEREK ANTHONY ANDERSON
Defendant:
JESSE EMERSON, ANDRE MIKSHA, PAUL KAUSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. ELLIS et al
as 2:2018cv00155
Defendant:
AMANDA BENSON, OFFICER BROOKS, OFFICER CARRILLO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C. TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JESSIE-BEY v. GEO et al
as 1:2017cv04578
Respondent:
JACK ADAMS, JAMES ANDREWS, JERRY BALENTINE and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY JOEL JESSIE-BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORRIS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, S. JULIAN, BARACK OBAMA and others
Petitioner:
JOHN NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NORRIS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2016cv03059
Plaintiff:
EUGENE NORRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
