Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Gordon v. Downing et al
as 3:2021cv00253
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gordon
Defendant:
John Wayne Downing and North Central Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson v. Reeves et al
as 1:2019cv00103
Defendant:
Chris Johnson, North Central Unit, Justin B Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woolfolk v. Gibbins et al
as 4:2019cv00353
Defendant:
Michael Gibbins and North Little Rock Police Department
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lee Woolfolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. North Little Rock Probation and Parole Office et al
as 4:2018cv00175
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
North Little Rock Probation and Parole Office, Pulaski County Arkansas, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. North Little Rock Probation and Parole Office et al
as 4:2018cv00125
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
North Little Rock Probation and Parole Office, Barry Sims and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. North Little Rock Police Department
as 4:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Glover McDaniel, Jr
Defendant:
North Little Rock Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Lisa R Murphy
Defendant:
Hughes, Crowell, Judy Biaza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Doc Holiday, North Little Rock Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. North Little Rock Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Manuel Vargas
Defendant:
North Little Rock Police Department, Larry Jegley, Jason Ables and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgel v. North Little Rock Police Department
as 4:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Ridgel
Defendant:
North Little Rock Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
