Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Jackson v. Schluter et al
as 2:2016cv02225
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Defendant:
Bradley J Schluter, . Flannery, John Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al
as 16-1888
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE MATHEWS, ALTON ANGUS, MICHAEL P. MELVIN and others
Jackson v. USA
as 4:2016cv00032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Heer et al
as 6:2015cv06531
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Defendant:
D. Heer, C. Zaluski, E. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Jackson v. Alton Angus, et al
as 15-2199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALTON ANGUS, Psychologist, MICHAEL P. MELVIN, Superintendent, LAWRENCE R. WEINER, Therapeutic Service Admission Review and others
JACKSON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant:
LOUIS FOLINO, JOHN DOE # 1, JOHN DOE # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. Peter Rundle, et al
as 15-1395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER RUNDLE, Law Librarian, sued in his individual and official capacity, MULLER, Law Library Supervisor, sued in his individual an dofficial capacity, SMITH, Inmates Counselor, sued in his individual and official capacity and others
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant, Prison Guard, Logan Correctional Center and EDDIE J. PAYNE, Prison Guard, Pinckneyville Prison
Jackson v. Rundle et al
as 2:2014cv02196
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Defendant:
Peter Rundle, . Mussler, . Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Jackson v. David Willis, et al
as 14-2658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID WILLIS, Lieutenant and EDDIE J. PAYNE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
