Cases 11 - 20 of 57
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JENNIFER ANNE PETERSON-BUCK, LINDA H. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson, III v. McGinley et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
Willie Peterson, III
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv04669
Plaintiff:
ALEX PETERSON
Defendant:
C/O/ KEISHA WATSON, C/O/ JOHN DOE ELBY and C/O/ JOHN DOE 2 KENNIZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Orlando et al
as 2:2021cv01193
Plaintiff:
Alex Peterson
Defendant:
Gina Orlando and (John Doe) c/o Guard Purifoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYNES v. DECANINI et al
as 2:2021cv00079
Defendant:
DPTY. WARDEN WHITE, LT. CIPOLLA, C/O HERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Peterson v. Morris et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Sylvia Morris and Ulli Klemm
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PETERSON v. TICE
as 2:2020cv00671
Respondent:
ERIC TICE
Petitioner:
DORIAN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETERSON v. OVERLANDER et al
as 2:2020cv01304
Petitioner:
RASHAUN PETERSON
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MR. OVERLANDER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PETERSON v. WARDEN DAVID BYRNE et al
as 2:2020cv00091
Defendant:
WARDEN DAVID BYRNE, NURSING DIRECTOR MARIEL TRIMBLE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RASHEED and others
Plaintiff:
TYRONE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. DOE et al
as 1:2019cv00333
Defendant:
MELISSA M. PETERSON, DORINA VARNER, DERRICK F. OBERLANDER and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY CHARLES HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
