Cases 11 - 20 of 197
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 23-2602
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS and others
Roberts v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv02652
Plaintiff:
Clifford C Roberts
Defendant:
Jacob E Williams, C/O Edwards, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinde v. Wooley et al
as 3:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stinde
Defendant:
Sarah C Wooley, S Waiker, Joshua Schoenbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
as 23-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS and others
Morris v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sherry Benton, Margaret Madole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royster v. Todd County Detention et al
as 1:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Samuel MacAurthur Royster, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd County Detention, Jeff Pennick and Todd County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bentley v. Morris et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dominique Bentley
Defendant:
Carri Morris, S. Buettner, Ms. Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royster v. Jamaludeen
as 2:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Earl T. Royster, Jr.
Defendant:
Abdul H. Jamaludeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royster v. Jamaludeen
as 2:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Earl Royster, Jr.
Defendant:
Abdul H. Jamaludeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackburn v. Security Staff et al
as 3:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Brondale Blackburn
Defendant:
Security Staff, Philip K. Royster, Terry E. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
