Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 833
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff: IMARI BUTLER
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Grigalanz v. State of Indiana
as 24-1315
Plaintiff: PHILLIP S. GRIGALANZ
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
MEADOWS v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00270
Petitioner: TIMOTHY MEADOWS
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner: RAYMOND C. WHITE
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WEBB v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00028
Petitioner: MERLE R. WEBB
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanaman v. Werner et al
as 4:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Leslie Grey Vanaman
Defendant: Katherine Werner, James Hayden, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner: JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02199
Petitioner: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?