Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Talandar v. Vermont
as 2:2021cv00010
Plaintiff:
Draxxion Talandar
Defendant:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Talandar v. Vermont
as 2:2021cv00011
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Petitioner:
Draxxion Talandar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abdul-Kareem v. Superior Court Windham County et al
as 5:2021cv00005
Respondent:
State of Vermont, Windham County State's Attorney's Office, Department of Mental Health and others
Petitioner:
Misbah Abdul-Kareem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scaperotta v. State of Vermont et al
as 1:2020cv00545
Defendant:
US District Court of Vermont, Town of Ludlow, Vermont, Barry Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jay Scaperotta
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trevathan v. State of Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00198
Defendant:
Core Civic and State of Vermont Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Rayshunn Trevathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Putvain v. State of Vermont et al
as 5:2020cv00125
Defendant:
Tina Bowen, Max Titus, Steve Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Lucas Putvain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. McFarlin et al
as 1:2020cv05689
Defendant:
Andrew J. McFarlin and State of Vermont
Plaintiff:
James Bond Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Touchette et al
as 2:2019cv00228
Respondent:
Mike Touchette, David E. Tartter and State of Vermont
Petitioner:
James Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burke v. Touchette et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Respondent:
Mike Touchette, David E. Tartter and State of Vermont
Petitioner:
James Thomas Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
