Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Eric Rambert, et al v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC X. RAMBERT
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY, JOHN PASSMORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, D. F. OBERLANDER, DSCS and others
Troy Coulston v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 16-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY COULSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT, MR. WILT, MR. YOUNG and others
Williams v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01259
Plaintiff:
Calvin Williams
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Inc., Khatri, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frye v. Wilt et al
as 1:2016cv01073
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Nathaniel Wilt, Steven Glunt, Pasquale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee Stewart v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 16-2239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEVEN GLUNT, Superintendent, CORIZON HEALTH INC and others
Frye v. Wilt et al
as 1:2016cv00780
Petitioner:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Nathaniel Wilt, Steven Glunt, Pasquale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee Stewart v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 16-1897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH INC, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Shawn Hampton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 16-1836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN HAMPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM MILLER, WILLIAM WILLIAMS, EBY and others
RAMBERT et al v. GRISBY et al
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
ERIC X. RAMBERT, ANTHONY R. JOHNSON, MICHAEL BUNDY and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, MICHAEL OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Walker v. Steven Glunt, et al
as 16-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN GLUNT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
