Cases 11 - 20 of 1,728
Gaynett Powell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10721
Plaintiff:
GAYNETT POWELL
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, MARK INCH, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Harris #292201 v. Davids et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Harris #292201
Defendant:
John Davids, Unknown Vonn, Unknown Dunigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
D. Smith, J. Servin, S. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carillo v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Victor Carillo
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, C. Santiago and J. Capilupo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Santiago v. Wyoming Attorney General
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Isaiah E Santiago
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state detainer)
Ivan McKinney v. Talia Ryan, et al
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
TALIA RUBEL RYAN, REBECCA SANTIAGO, WILLIAM LEONARD and others
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
