Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv08007
Petitioner:
Stacey Fitzgerald Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stacey v. Fountain et al
as 1:2019cv00373
Defendant:
COI Penn, Lt. Norman, Lt. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus W. Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. Fountain et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00370
Defendant:
COI Penn, Lt. Norman, Lt. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus W. Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Southern Health Partners et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2018cv00639
Defendant:
David Towers, Southern Health Partners, Sarah Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rodney Bradley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrell v. Small et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
George Edward Jarrell
Defendant:
Phillip Small and Michael Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Felton et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00633
Plaintiff:
Stacey JoAnn Cobb
Defendant:
Mrs. Felton, Gwendolyn Tarrance, Captain Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Rutherford et al
as 5:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Stone
Defendant:
Stacey Rutherford, Madison County Sheriffs Department, Madison County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00653
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lamar Thomas
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Stacey Singleton, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grays v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2012cv01154
Petitioner:
Stacey Kwaimaine Grays
Respondent:
Billy Mitchem and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conner v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2010cv03171
Plaintiff:
Deric Brian Conner
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Andrew Jairam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
