Cases 11 - 20 of 231
John Spaulding v. J. Streeval
as 24-6042
Petitioner:
JOHN MARTIN SPAULDING
Respondent:
J. C. STREEVAL, Warden
Jontavious Lyons v. J. Streeval
as 23-7285
Petitioner:
JONTAVIOUS KYREE LYONS
Respondent:
WARDEN J. C. STREEVAL
Franklin v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00771
Petitioner:
Jonathan R. Franklin
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval and D.O.J. (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stewart v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Stewart
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Delorenzo v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00760
Petitioner:
Frank Delorenzo
Respondent:
Mr. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Price v. Streeval et al
as 7:2023cv00754
Plaintiff:
Sean Price
Defendant:
Warden Streeval, Asst. Warden, Capt. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bacon v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00613
Petitioner:
Michael A. Bacon
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 7:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(PC) Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 1:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
