Cases 11 - 20 of 49
SLEETS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv04182
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILLIAM SLEETS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES ARMY, US ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. United States Army
as 5:2021cv03194
Petitioner:
Raekwon Miller
Respondent:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Strege v. Bureau of Prisons Central Office Food Directors et al
as 3:2020cv05655
Defendant:
Hardees Hamburgers Resturaunt Owners, Eric Vos, Metropolitan Detention Center Gaurds and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Strege
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01906
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren v. United States Army
as 2:2019cv11474
Plaintiff:
Brian Andre Warren
Defendant:
United States Army
Nalty v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv01339
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
United States, United States Army, Judicial Branch of US Gov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nalty et al v. Compass Group, TLC. et al
as 1:2018cv01295
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Compass Group, TLC., Nelson Silva, Trinity Services Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dancingbuck v. Haney et al
as 3:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Punalera Dancingbuck
Defendant:
William R. Haney, Jacelyn C. Dunstan, Barbara Gonzalex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ackerman v. United States Army
as 1:2017cv02290
Petitioner:
Edwin Mark Ackerman
Respondent:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
