Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Demos et al v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 4:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr and Society of TRUTH
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Zimmerman et al
as 5:2015cv05224
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Whitt
Defendant:
Arkasnas Department of Human Services (DHS), Shallen Carrol, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv05205
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Knox
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and John or Jane Doe Loss Prevention Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2012cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Paul
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, Best Buy, Big Lots Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caradine/Assabur v. Wal-Mart Inc
as 4:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
William F Caradine/Assabur
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Blytheville, City of et al
as 3:2009cv00202
Plaintiff:
Rodney Charles White, Sr
Defendant:
Blytheville, City of, Blytheville Police Department, Terry Winkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parks v. Wengard et al
as 5:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Parks
Defendant:
Wengard, Wal-Mart Supercenter Inc, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Wal-Mart et al
as 6:2009cv06100
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Parks
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Adam Castile, Micheal Buffington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Wal-Mart et al
as 4:2009cv00790
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Parks
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Adam Castile, Micheal Buffington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
