Cases 21 - 30 of 953
Crump v. Clemens et al
as 5:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Sheila Clemens, (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. DeBouse
as 24-10431
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Meeks, III
Defendant:
Alvin DeBouse, FNU LNU, Chief Probation Officer, John Doe Task Force and others
Crump v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Johnson County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1071
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1071
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturkey v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Sturkey
Defendant:
Chad Chronister, FNU LNU and Cruz LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulk v. Sessler et al
as 8:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Tiffany J Paulk
Defendant:
FNU Sessler and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
