Cases 21 - 30 of 1,432
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and others
Honaker v. Lincoln County Jail
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Shannon Doyle Honaker
Defendant:
Lincoln County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Doyle
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Medical Staff and Doctor, C.O.s and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Doyle L. Heard
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Garland
as 1:2024cv00217
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kearney, Michael v. Cromwell, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Kearney
Defendant:
Daniel Cromwell, Corey Rahlf, Sheldon Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finnell v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
Govern Mike DeWine, Lt. Jon Husted, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARD v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
DOYLE L HEARD
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY B MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5303
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael J. Horowitz, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Hartley v. Cate et al
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Hartley
Defendant:
Nathan Cate, Criminal Clerk's Office, Metro Impound Lot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
