Cases 21 - 30 of 50
JACKSON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv00850
Plaintiff:
OMAR JACKSON
Defendant:
MICHELE BAKER, BRIDGETTE WRIGHT, ROBERT D. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, MARK DIALESSANDRO, DSCS, ADAM SEDLOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Kipple et al
as 3:2017cv01526
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Riley
Defendant:
Kipple, Amjad Ali, Aaron Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZAMICHIELI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
LAMONT ZAMICHIELI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM NICHOLSON, NATALIE D. AUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VAUGHN v. GILL et al
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
AARON VAUGHN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL, S.C .I. GREENE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL AND HIS CO-WORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ABD-ALI v. SIBANDA et al
as 2:2016cv01643
Plaintiff:
WALI IBN AL-ISLAM ABD-ALI
Defendant:
SIBANDA, M. DIALESANDRO, K. SOKOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOZER v. RIGGENBACH et al
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Defendant:
ANGELA RIGGENBACH, L.S. KERNS-BARR, MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01167
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, FREIGHT, BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALIE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DALIE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, DIANA WOODSIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARCLAY v. SOKOL et al
as 2:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL BARCLAY
Defendant:
KAREN SOKOL and SILBAUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
