Cases 21 - 30 of 214
Robinson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00753
Petitioner:
Louis Tyrone Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00311
Petitioner:
Antonio Smith
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Frink
as 1:2022cv01170
Petitioner:
Randall Ward
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sexton, Jr et al v. Core Civic Incorporated of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Hubert G. Sexton, Jr, Dennis Carroll, Billy Hobbs and others
Defendant:
Core Civic Incorporated of Tennessee, Damon Hininger, Steve Conry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Martin et al
as 2:2022cv02403
Plaintiff:
Corry Taylor and Cory Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Martin, Shelby County, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00461
Petitioner:
Antonio Smith
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. Frink
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
James Dominic Stevenson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Frink
as 1:2022cv00145
Petitioner:
Stephen Gerard Smith
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
Charles Randolph Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00332
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
